The problem with Tony Blair has nothing to do with his politics or his morality – the problem is illustrated by what CS Lewis said on the subject:
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Tony Blair’s moral imperative is unchecked. He has too much power. And the absolute certainty of moral conviction becomes a very dangerous thing indeed when it is combined with as much power as he has.
There are now over 3,000 more criminal offences in UK law than there were before New Labour came to power. Crime detection rates have fallen, and instead of doing anything about it, this government has tried to legislate its way out of the problem. Not using its power to solve problems, but exercising its power – flexing its muscles – to assert what it believes to be right.
To compare, New Labour has created more criminal offences in its nine years than the Thatcher-Major Governments did in 18. And the rate at which laws are passed is steadily increasing.
And what sort of laws are these? Well, it is now illegal to sell grey squirrels or to create a nuclear explosion in the UK. If you go on holiday and fail to give a neighbour a key and instructions to turn off your burglar alarm when it goes off, then you have broken the law. You cannot import potatoes from Poland.
Meanwhile, the carbon lobby is campaigning against 4x4s when the most heavily polluting vehicles in the country (like Gordon Brown’s Vauxhall Omega) are being ignored; cheap flights are being condemned but I cannot get planning permission for a wind turbine on my roof (not that it would be carbon neutral anyway, given how they are made in China); road pricing is being deliberately targeted against the guilt-wracked middle classes, against the will of 1.6million people; and then there is the small matter of a war in a Middle Eastern country.
So I have come to a conclusion. You would never believe what I now think is best for this country.
I think we need a government of selfish bastards. We need politicians who understand the basic job of politics: to protect the health and welfare of the state. Not its extension or expansion, but its health. I want politicians who have no interest in changing people, in progress or in reform. I want politicians who crave political power not because they are on a personal evangelical crusade, but because they lust after the trappings of power. And who, when they achieve power, can be relied upon to selfishly indulge themselves in it – to do the least they can get away with.
Politicians who listen to what people want so they can judge what they need to do to win the next election – not a thing more, not a thing less.
If we had elected someone to do that in 1997, there would have been no Iraq war, no congestion charge, and no endless barrage of new laws.