Some ‘autistic’ children aren’t ill, they’re just badly behaved? (an article by Katie Grant? in the Sunday Times.)
Frankly, this idiot woman has said that 9 times out of ten, Autism is actually the result of bad parenting, family breakdown or even putting young children into nurseries instead of letting mothers raise them in the home. She regards Autism as “an ism” adopted by trendy parents as an excuse for their brats’ bad behaviour, calling it an “illness” and clearly distinguishing it from “children who really do suffer from neurological disorders” – but one which parents like to claim because, she says, they get an £80 a week disability allowance for it. (I wish it was that much!)
If she wanted to write about the 600% increase in diagnosed Autism in this country, then perhaps she should have written something about? the massive improvement in diagnostic tools available to the medical profession? and the differences between the two extreme ends of the Autism spectrum.
But that would have taken research, which is hard work? – and wouldn’t have been even slightly sensational. Almost boring. Not deceitful, anyway.
Instead she has ranted about all parents of children with? Autism, failing to make any accurate comments about the condition, and demonstrating that she hasn’t made a scrap of effort to discover what life is actually like for these parents. It’s almost as if the entirety of her research was in the pages of Mark Haddon’s book, which she implies is to blame for the glut of trendy parents exploiting this lucrative new excuse.
As one mother at ASDf said, “Surely she cannot be unaware that less than a month ago a mother of an autistic child killed herself and her son because she could not cope. Perhaps she crumbled under the strain of being so fashionable and well-off?”
There was a time when mental disabilities were called “feeble-mindedness.” These days, that view is rightly considered too offensive to repeat. There was also a time when the mothers of children with Autism were blamed for it, and called “refrigerator mums.” Before the weekend, I thought that was now considered too offensive to repeat.
And it doesn’t make a scrap of difference that Katie Grant explicitly excludes ‘the tenth time out of ten.’ Her article is overflowing with errors: confusing Autism with ADHD (kind of like confusing paraplegia with having a broken leg); grossly overestimating both the size and ease of claiming the DLA; calling Autism an “illness.”
This is journalism at its worst.